Analyst: Apple Will Combine OS X And iOS By 2012

Analyst: Apple Will Combine OS X And iOS By 2012

A new note from Peter Misek, a Jefferies & Co. analyst, suggests that Apple may move to combine/unify iOS and OS X into a singular operating system. According to Misek, this would help Apple to achieve a better gross margin, and would make it easier to license content.

The note continues by suggesting that by doing so, Apple would then have a much easier time licensing movies and television shows to store in the cloud, which Apple customers could then watch not only on the iPhone, iPad, and AppleTV, but even the Mac. It would also help the content transition seamlessly between each device. Misek believes such a move would be difficult if iOS and OS X were kept separate.

Misek also believes that the “merger” of the platforms could boost unit sales across the product line, and he models a 50-cent-per-share-per-year boost to EPS for “every 1% increase in unit volumes” as a result. He also thinks a final merger into a single 64-bit platform could boost Apple’s margins significantly.

Misek believes that the process will likely beging by Apple placing an “A6” processor into a MacBook Air in 2012-2013, which would enable it to run iOS and iOS apps. While the new MacBook Air would run a “converged” version of a new combined OS, machines like the MacBook Pro and other “professional” hardware would continue to run OS X. Even so, according to Misek, even the “pro” Macs will move to the “converged” OS by 2016.

Personally, this really doesn’t make a great deal of sense to me – MacBooks and Desktop Macs simply perform different tasks and have different software “needs” than iOS devices like the iPhone and iPad. I’m not convinced it would be a very simple task to create a single operating system that works well on both current iOS devices and Macs. They could go the route that Microsoft seems to be going with Windows 8, which is likely to be multi-platform in this manner – having an simplified user interface for basic users, but allowing more advanced users to work in a more “classic” PC environment.

Features such as a file system, disk management tools, and a windowing system just aren’t necessary for iOS devices, but for Mac users that want to retain more control over their files, multi-task more efficiently, and manage their disks (such as creating and modifying partitions for storage, OS X, Boot Camp, etc) are crucial to a significant number of Mac users.

Another possibility to consider is that Apple will simply create an iOS front-end for OS X, which would allow Mac users to run iOS apps and access content only available on iOS while maintaining the standard OS X platform. This could function similarly to the Apple TV, which (despite its lack of apps) runs a unique variant of iOS that caters to its specific features.

Despite my reservations, however, this idea may not be as outrageous as it might seem at first. OS X Lion is significantly more like iOS than Snow Leopard, and this wouldn’t be the first rumor that has surfaced regarding a MacBook Air powered by Apple’s custom silicon. Further, Steve Jobs himself said, when Cheetah was launched in March of 2001, that OS X would be Apple’s operating system “for the next decade,” and a decade has already passed.

Could Apple be working on a new next-gen version of Mac OS that successfully combines the Mac OS with iOS? Sure. But my personal take on the matter is not to count on it.

  1. TheloniousMac says:

    First of all, saying that Lion is like iOS is like saying that an F35 Lightning Wing is like a Toyota Camry because they both use electronic control systems. Lion has simply adopted a few features of iOS that Apple has worked hard to perfect. This does not mean that OS X is becoming iOS. Over the years to come there will be cross pollination of usability ideas, and I suspect that OS X will come to *incorporate* a great many iOS features, but they will not be merging. Yeesh. Read what the “analyst” says. He’s an idiot and not deserving of all this Mac media attention.

  2. Cheetah in March 2011 huh?

  3. The features that Lion included will be about as close as to being iOS-like as Apple will make it. Unless Apple wants to make a touch screen computer (isn’t that what iPad is?), then iOS won’t ever be on their Mac line or OS X on their iDevices. Who would really want to run iOS apps on their Mac? Get the digital video adapter if you want to use your iDevice on a large screen. Thanks to iCloud, the bridge between OS X and iOS is becoming shorter in terms of syncing content between your devices. I just don’t see a point in making one unified OS for both platforms. Windows Mobile isn’t necessary Windows 7 but they incorporate similar features. I mean, how much more like each other can you make iOS and OS X?

  4. Steyn says:

    No way!

  5. Steyn says:

    No way!

  6. MiSucks says:

    Peter Misek is an idiot and obviously has a poor understanding about technology.

  7. 380652 594370Good web site. On your blogs extremely interest and i will tell a pals. 197090

  8. 85166 923656Hi! I discovered your site accidentally today, but am genuinely pleased that we did! Its not only entertaining, but in addition straightforward to make use of in contrast to lots that Ive viewed! 309248

  9. 쿠쿠티비 says:

    139310 66563A lot of thanks I ought say, impressed along with your website. I will post this to my facebook wall. 928335

  10. THC says:

    552928 364228Wohh exactly what I was searching for, regards for putting up. 343407

  11. 950142 25329This is sensible information! Exactly where else will if ind out a lot more?? Who runs this joint too? sustain the excellent function 196855

  12. 658493 509024so considerably great details on here, : D. 299009

  13. 273937 86897Paper rolls quite great read you know alot about this topic i see! 799404

  14. 528904 342834jobs for high school students – Search for Jobs on our web site, we offer several excellent links towards the finest and biggest Portals to finding a Job as a high school student! 892758

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.