• Home
  • Apple
  • News
  • Court Denies Apple Bid to Remove Bromwich as E-books Antitrust Monitor

Court Denies Apple Bid to Remove Bromwich as E-books Antitrust Monitor

Court Denies Apple Bid to Remove Bromwich as E-books Antitrust Monitor

An appeals court on Wednesday denied Apple’s efforts to have e-books antitrust monitor Michael Bromwich removed from his overseeing the company’s business, saying the company lacked sufficient reasons to have him replaced.

Court Denies Apple Bid to Remove Bromwich as E-books Antitrust Monitor

AppleInsider:

In the decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York admitted that some of the actions made by Bromwich “give pause.” But that wasn’t enough to have him entirely removed from his oversight position, as noted by Reuters.

Bromwich was assigned to oversee Apple’s business operations in October 2013, following the company’s loss in an antitrust lawsuit brought by the U.S. Government. Bromwich was a former DOJ Inspector General and federal prosecutor, who had previously served as the first director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, a body created in response to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. He has also served as an independent monitor to the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia in 2002, and also served as a federal lawyer in the U.S. case against Oliver North.

Apple was found guilty in July 2013 of colluding with five major e-book publishers in a price-fixing scheme covering e-books sold in the iBookstore. The company and Bromwich had difficulty in seeing eye-to-eye form the beginning, with the relationship worsening in recent months.

Bromwich told Judge Denise Cote in April that Apple has taken a more “adversarial tone” recently, telling her no conversations have been conducted since January, as Apple continually rejected his requests.

For Apple’s part, the company says his reviews have gone beyond the original intent by the court, and while the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals apparently agreed with some of the company’s criticisms of Bromwich, it didn’t feel there was enough evidence to justify the appointing of a new compliance monitor.

  1. elojob says:

    53181 5954A person essentially aid to make seriously articles I would state. This really is the first time I frequented your web site page and thus far? I surprised with the research you created to make this particular publish incredible. Amazing job! 309765

  2. 378177 426411great post. Neer knew this, thanks for letting me know. 861194

  3. 852997 708174This internet site is my breathing in, quite fantastic pattern and perfect content . 75925

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *